They must be sure they can bilk the American public out of even more billions. With Biden and Kamala Harris in the White House, it is actually likely that we lose billions more to Iran, as these two always do what hurts this nation the most. All part of the plan.
In a move that caught many off guard, Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, opened a narrow but significant door to renewed talks with the United States, hinting at a willingness to engage over his nation’s rapidly advancing nuclear program. On Tuesday, Khamenei, a figure whose words carry the weight of absolute authority in Iran, signaled that there might be “no harm” in conversing with what he called “the enemy,” provided that the talks serve Iranian interests and are approached with extreme caution. His words hung in the air like a paradox—an invitation wrapped in a warning, a step forward laced with trepidation.
The Iranian Supreme Leader @khamenei_ir informs the government of the possibility of resuming negotiations with the #United_States regarding the nuclear program. pic.twitter.com/3vkjikbzYr
— SUMERIA Middle East (@Sumeria_ME) August 27, 2024
Khamenei’s comments, marked by their characteristic blend of pragmatism and skepticism, seemed to echo the sentiment that led to the 2015 nuclear deal—a fleeting moment when Iran and the world powers, including the U.S., found common ground. Back then, Tehran agreed to scale back its nuclear ambitions in return for economic relief. Today, however, the landscape is far more fraught. The shadow of the Israel-Hamas conflict looms large, the U.S. faces a contentious presidential election, and the air in the Middle East is thick with tension and mistrust.
“There is no harm in that, but do not place your hopes in them,” Khamenei cautioned, his words a stark reminder that while dialogue might be on the table, trust is not. This duality is classic Khamenei—a man who has often vacillated between endorsing and dismissing talks with Washington. His admonition to President Masoud Pezeshkian’s government was clear: negotiate if you must, but never forget who you are dealing with.
For Pezeshkian, a reformist who ascended to power under tragic circumstances after a helicopter crash claimed his predecessor, Khamenei’s green light to engage could be a double-edged sword. The president, who campaigned on a platform of re-engagement with the West, now finds himself navigating a political minefield. His cabinet, filled with veterans like Abbas Araghchi—who played a pivotal role in the 2015 deal—could be poised to take a step toward diplomacy, but only with Khamenei’s shadow looming large over every decision.
Amid tensions with #Israel, #Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei suggested renewing #USA nuclear negotiations, stating to Iran’s government that there are no “barriers” to engaging with the U.S. https://t.co/ghOdkyhw2Q pic.twitter.com/DIOE5wCAVp
— Hindustan Times (@htTweets) August 27, 2024
The global stage is no less volatile. Since the collapse of the 2015 agreement, Iran has pushed the limits of its nuclear program, enriching uranium to levels alarmingly close to weapons-grade. Surveillance cameras meant to keep the world’s peace of mind have been disrupted, and international inspectors barred. It’s a game of high-stakes poker where every move is scrutinized, every action weighed against possible repercussions.
Meanwhile, Iran’s tensions with Israel have escalated to new heights. The shadow war between these regional powerhouses has spilled into overt conflict, with Tehran launching a bold missile and drone attack on Israel in April, a direct response to an Israeli strike in Syria that killed two Iranian generals. The assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran added another layer of volatility, with Tehran vowing revenge—a promise that hangs like a sword over the region.
As all eyes turn toward Washington, the United States, too, is on the brink of potential change. With Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump leading the race for the next presidency, the future of U.S.-Iran relations is uncertain. Harris has struck a hardline tone, pledging to defend American interests against Iranian threats, while Trump’s return could mean a return to the “maximum pressure” campaign that led to the U.S. withdrawal from the nuclear deal in 2018.
Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei hinted this morning at the possibility of returning to nuclear talks, saying there was no contradiction in holding talks with the enemy. pic.twitter.com/Zt6MueYp2v
— S p r i n t e r (@SprinterFamily) August 27, 2024
The situation is fluid, almost impossible to pin down. If Harris wins the presidency, there might be a cautious push towards a new deal, especially if the conflict in Gaza begins to de-escalate. But Iran, once bitten, is twice shy. They will likely demand stronger guarantees against a future U.S. exit, less inclined to dismantle their nuclear capabilities without assurances of long-term commitments. The lessons of the past loom large, and Tehran is not eager to repeat them.
Tuesday’s meeting between Khamenei and Pezeshkian’s Cabinet also brought back a familiar face—former Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, a seasoned diplomat who helped shape the 2015 deal. Despite a previous resignation over the cabinet’s makeup, Zarif has now signaled his return as a vice president in Pezeshkian’s administration. His presence suggests that while the players might be wary, they are not yet ready to fold. The game is still on, the stakes higher than ever, and the outcome far from certain.
Major Points
- Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has hinted at possible talks with the U.S. on Iran’s nuclear program, stressing caution and national interest.
- The suggestion comes amid rising regional tensions and recalls the 2015 nuclear deal.
- President Masoud Pezeshkian supports engaging with the West but must balance this with Khamenei’s cautious stance.
- U.S. reactions are uncertain ahead of the upcoming elections, with differing potential approaches from Kamala Harris and Donald Trump.
- Iran’s nuclear progress and regional conflicts highlight the risks and complexities of any future negotiations.
Lap Fu Ip – Reprinted with permission of Whatfinger News
